Grand Rising and Good Day morris bey.
This is in response to your text received today the Fifth day of December Two Thousand and Twenty.
As per your text here, you confirmed that our verbal communication on the Twenty-Ninth day of November Two Thousand and Twenty.
That verbal communication contained conflicting information regarding who remains the owner of the signed orginal documents that camraael bey sent for me to fill out (Declaration of Nationality & State Oath that has red thumb print and red pen autograph).
The purpose of requesting clarification was for a clear answer as to who owns the original document by retaining the original signed copy. Your text here confirmed that following our verbal communication we communicated in written in the WhatsApp Moor Knowledge Class on the second day of December Two Thousand and Twenty.
Once again, those two documents where sent by camraael bey. The question was asked for clarity on the same topic of ownership of the signed document and who retains possession of them. camreel bey answered stating that Moor House Law keeps the orginal and mario bey, a long standing student, stated that we keep the orginal, once again demonstrating that it is not only me who was erudited on ownership of our documents.
The position you took was that the form is intellectual property and as such, the contents belongs to Moor House Law and INAR. With that reasoning, then all teachings in class is thus intellectual property and thus belongs to camraael, Moor House Law and INAR. That would mean writing it down for oneselve on your own paper is still theft called plagiarizing.
Question? where did camraael acquire this knowledge to put on his paper to then claim ownership? i do believe that all the knowledge being used came from someone else’s time investment.
morris bey, what i do not have time to do is waste it especially in such a time as this. Playing games with word play and operating in confusion, is also not part of who i am. Your text to me stating “kindly and respectfully complete your first intentions appropriately” is a clear attempt in switching the microscope of integrity of the information given in the UberConference Noble Drew Ali online class unto me not emailing you when it has already been addressed?
The pattern that i am seeing here is double mindedness and the practice of side conversations, that likes to occur separate from public ones. i do not mix with either one professionally or personally.
Objective Truth and Truth Seekers say what they mean and mean what they say no matter where a response is asked. Saying one thing in an open space in class, then coming one-on-one to say another thing is unethical, unprofessional and out of integrity. In none of my interactions with you or any Agent of INAR or Moor House law, have i conducted myself or by businesses in such manner.
The intention of emailing you for clarification was for the point of interest question as to who owns my signed original documents provided by Moor House Law Office, me or Moor House Law Office. That point of interest was answered by the Senior lawyer of Moor House Law office who is also an Agent of Moor Science Consulate and a member of INAR on the Second day of December Two Thousand and Twenty in the Moor Knowledge Class WhatsApp group that you were also present in, with read receipts that acknowledge your awareness.
It feels very much to me that i am moving from being owned from one Master to another. Like moving from one brotherhood to another. One chess player to another. Freedom is freedom and ownership by any other should never occur.
Peace and Love.
Lady O's Blog❤ 